I don't know the relevance of the fact that the perpetrator is Romanian. It seems like too much information. It seems racist, particularly in the current climate.
Romanian admits murdering Israeli woman in her London homeA Romanian who murdered a popular Israeli woman in her home is facing life behind bars.
I went to leave a comment and noticed below the comment box a cluster of other Jewish News articles including this:
I left the comment asking what the relevance of a murderer's nationality was and of course I was implicitly criticising the obvious racism in providing such irrelevant information. But when I noticed the second article I realised that racism at the Jewish News appears to be so casual they might not even understand what I was saying.
OPINION: Arabs need to grow up and look after their own refugees
And yet they do appear to recognise racism in some instances though they appear to be reluctant to call it what it is. In the same cluster of headlines below the first article there was another, an "editor's opinion" explaining "why we must champion multiculturism". Its the editor (apparently) criticising the racism of a Jewish UKIP member, Jeremy Zeid, who said that whites from Ilford in Essex were victims of "ethnic cleansing". Here's a taste of the editor's opinion:
does Mr Zeid represent today’s clash of civilisations? Has he and his party, which has an unfortunate habit of strafing whole races and religions with its stray sound-bites, barged its way to the front in this cultural showdown?
If so, are we now being led by these yesteryear generals asking “why the bloody hell should they apologise”?
If so, where are we being led? And if we don’t speak out against their hate-filled bile, are we collectively only as good as them?
I'm more than happy for this editor chap, I think his name's Richard Ferrer, to condemn UKIP and its racism but if he is that concerned he might want to put his own house in order.